翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Bell Township ・ Bell Township, Clearfield County, Pennsylvania ・ Bell Township, Jefferson County, Pennsylvania ・ Bell Township, Kansas ・ Bell Township, Pennsylvania ・ Bell Township, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania ・ Bell Trade Act ・ Bell tree ・ Bell triangle ・ Bell Trinity Square ・ Bell TV ・ Bell UH-1 Iroquois ・ Bell UH-1 Iroquois variants ・ Bell UH-1N Twin Huey ・ Bell UH-1Y Venom ・ Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd ・ Bell V-280 Valor ・ Bell v. Maryland ・ Bell v. State ・ Bell v. Wolfish ・ Bell Valley ・ Bell Video Store ・ Bell Ville ・ Bell Weir Lock ・ Bell Witch ・ Bell Witch Cave ・ Bell Witch Haunting ・ Bell X-1 ・ Bell X-14 ・ Bell X-16 Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd ''Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd'' () (UKHL 2 ) is an English contract law case decided by the House of Lords. Within the field of mistake in English law, it holds that common mistake does not lead to a void contract unless the mistake is fundamental to the identity of the contract. ==Facts== Lever Brothers Ltd (which merged in 1930 to become Unilever) was a company which traded in Niger, through a 99% owned subsidiary called the Niger Company (formerly the Royal Niger Company). The Niger trade was in trouble. Lord Leverhulme, the owner of Lever Bros, hired D'Arcy Cooper (a Quaker and senior partner of his Uncle's accountant firm, Cooper Brothers) to be the chairman and manage the crisis. Cooper negotiated a loan from Barclays Bank, which insisted that a professional management run the Niger subsidiary. So, Cooper hired his friend, Ernest Hyslop Bell, a senior Barclays manager in 1923 as chairman of the subsidiary. Mr Snelling, a tax consultant that had successfully got Lever Bros a big tax refund in 1921, was appointed as vice chairman. They did well, and turned a profit. The company was then merged with a former competitor (African and Eastern Trade Corporation) to form the United Africa Company in 1929. Bell had wanted to run the new United Africa Company, because he was too old at 54 to have a job in the City, and he had left his Barclays position. At lunch in the Savoy Grill he agreed with Cooper that he would get a big compensation package (£30,000) and retire. A similar "golden parachute" of £20,000 was given to Mr Snelling. However, shortly after, it was revealed that Bell and Snelling had been part of a regional cocoa cartel, and used information on future price reductions to sell cocoa from their personal accounts. Lever Brothers Ltd therefore brought a claim for rescission of the compensation package on grounds of mistake of fact. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.